Most people use AI models completely wrong.
They burn hundreds of dollars prompting Claude Opus or GPT-4 just to classify an email or route a ticket.
When teams encounter fast, probability-based models like Jev, they try to chat with them like ChatGPT ๐ฌ
When they get raw probabilities instead of paragraphs, they assume the tool is broken.
In reality, pairing fast probabilistic decision-makers with heavy reasoning engines is the highest-leverage pattern in modern AI engineering ๐
Inside this 8-slide carousel:
1๏ธโฃ The Core Concept: Chatbot vs. Probability Engine (200x faster, 400x cheaper)
2๏ธโฃ Shift 01: Replace one-time static rules with self-improving loops (accuracy jumps from 43% to 81%+)
3๏ธโฃ Shift 02: Dynamic micro-loops for browser automation (12 turns vs 36 turns, 50% lower cost)
4๏ธโฃ Shift 03: Sub-second context window compaction (0.5s token filtering vs 35s frozen terminals)
5๏ธโฃ Shift 04: Audit your skills and hooks to uncover hidden decision bottlenecks
6๏ธโฃ Shift 05: Build a 100ms AIOS model router across tiers (Tier 1 local, Tier 2 synthesis, Tier 3 Opus)
7๏ธโฃ Key Rules to Remember: Fast classifiers decide WHO executes; frontier models execute with full focus.
Which repetitive decision in your current tech stack is still burning expensive tokens? Drop your thoughts below ๐ฌ
โป๏ธ Repost this carousel to help fellow engineers design faster, cost-efficient AI workflows.
โ Follow Deven Goratela for practical insights on AI systems architecture, agentic loops, and engineering frameworks.
#AIArchitecture #ClaudeCode #LLMOps #WorkflowAutomation #PromptEngineering #ArtificialIntelligence
Video Source
